Aug 212016

The slow motion #trainwreck continues in the leper colony known as CRA. It appears that Alice Khosravy, the CRA’s Black Widow is slowly starting to weed out CRA Board Members.

Craig was described as a “Disgusting, Sweaty Pig” by Khosravy deputy Wendy Albright (she of the $10000 FPPC Fine). (I have the screenshots of the texts somewhere, but how could I forget this?)

When I first heard the news, I was hoping that maybe some time away from Politics would help Craig deal with the pious, pompous, self-righteous arrogant streak that has characterized him for years. Maybe a more balanced and mature Alexander would transform from a pariah to someone who used their talents for productive good.

Then I read his resignation email. While he had valid points, the highlights of his character flaws were evident.

Craig pointed out that the CRA needs to get younger and get more members. Alice and crew will never let the CRA grow, a larger organization will be more difficult to control. The two most recent CRA units are fraudulent shells in my opinion and are already beset with infighting.

Craig Alexander was indeed ideally suited for CRA. It appears that Craig has come out on the losing end of an internal pissing match and has decided to take his ball and go home. Such is life in the ineffective debating society known as CRA.

The CRA’s Pol-Pot Bellied Information Minister Tom Hudson – who was recently at the CRA’s OC BBQ (attended by roughly 30 people despite representing 7 remaining CRA units) – is finding himself increasingly isolated.

Hudson, as you may recall is the executive director of a shell organization that is effectively a PAC that endorses and does the usual pay-for-play crap that “Republican Taxpayer Groups” do. While Hudson is emptying the boxes of wine at home, his business partner Mike Spence got in to a major accident and appears to be in major trouble.

Craig Alexander was, until yesterday, Tom Hudson’s firewall and biggest ally in the CRA.

Hudson is privately disdained by most people on the CRA’s board that I know. Most of them lack the character to be honest and open about it until, of course the opportunity arises to participate in the next purge. The Game of Thrones has nothing on the CRA – because at least some of the characters portrayed in the Game of Thrones can function in normal life.

CRA UPDATE: Arranging the AD68 Deck Chairs? Wait – is the OC Endorsing Convention Being Hosted Along With the CRA Convention?

 AD68 Race, Craig Alexander, Thomas N Hudson  Comments Off on CRA UPDATE: Arranging the AD68 Deck Chairs? Wait – is the OC Endorsing Convention Being Hosted Along With the CRA Convention?
Dec 212015

Oh no, not Harry Sidhu. He is a RINO, we can’t have him. (Why he is a RINO is beyond me, but who cares…)

Oh no, not Stephen Choi, the tax raising Council-Member from Irvine.

Oh no – not DUI Deborah Pauly.

No, no, no – the CRA can not endorse any of them was the decree from Boss Hog, via a series of phone calls from his Dana Point Law Office. Boss Hog is now the #2 material of the CRA.

Whilst Sir-Round was sitting on his throne in Elverta, Boss Hog was hard at work trying to arrange the deck chairs in the southern fiefdom. It is hard work attempting to keep the dwindling population of serfs happy after the Northern Cossacks were run out of town.

Could it be that Sir-Round is soliciting more tribute? Might people have to once again ring the toll booth at the doorway of the CRA to again receive the once-coveted signet?

The Assembly District 68 race is a hot ticket in the southern fiefdom and may well be the last real drama until several districts are forced open in 2024. Sir-Round and Boss Hog – two members of the CRA’s 900 (and soon to be 3 for a half-ton club) have to struggle to keep the CRA relevant again.

Which leads us to the next irony – when Sir-Round was the #2 material of the CRA he opposed combining the CRA’s endorsing conventions with the state convention. Boss Hog – who was in a self-imposed exile in Dana Point cried foul about the CRA’s attempts to gain sponsorships and the combining of the conventions.

It appears that the dwindling population of serfs and the ever-expanding population of lower nobility within CRA is unable to sustain such lavish affairs. What, with the price of admission going up dramatically and the sudden reversal of policy on the local endorsing conventions – it appears that Sir-Round is the duke of the Kingdom of Id.

In addition to the sudden combination of the Orange County endorsing convention with the state convention – there is a wrinkle in AD68 – former CRA VP Alexia Deligianni has also thrown her hat in to the ring.

Ms. Deligianni has been friends with Boss Hog for a long time. It would appear that the orders will be handed down to the serfs to endorse Ms. Deligianni.

Whether tribute is paid to the crown or not, it looks like the toll booth has been reset at the front door of the Kingdom of Id. Would-be travelers beware.

CRA Update: The Suicide of CRA is Upon Us. Election of Death Panel Nears Completion

 California Republican Assembly, Craig Alexander, Thomas N Hudson, Tom Hudson  Comments Off on CRA Update: The Suicide of CRA is Upon Us. Election of Death Panel Nears Completion
Aug 032015

Prologue: Thanks to all for the record traffic on my recent blog posts. I appreciate your patronage.

Apparently Tom Hudson is trying to cover himself for his rogue rampage. He has acted on his own without the approval of the CRA Board of Directors when threatening local charities, local activists and local electeds in Placer County. Now he is in a bear trap – and it appears that other CRA Board Members in their rage can’t see the landmine they have stepped on.

He asked the CRA’s board to give him and a committee of 5 other people the ability to sue and threaten people on their behalf. Don’t take my word for it – read the on line board vote he requested.

Craig Alexander is now claiming that starting a letter with the claim he has been retained by the PCRA and CRA is not a “demand” but rather a request. This is lawyer-speak for I got caught and now I am using a dictionary to escape accountability. You don’t send people letters on legal stationery asking for money back without them or others construing it as a demand. It does not matter what a legal dictionary says (or the definition of is) – it is how the thousands of people that read this blog are reacting to Craig’s actions.

The fight between us and Thomas N Hudson started with the McClintock non-endorsement. Because Tom Hudson is a bully with no conscience (also known as a sociopath), he has pulled the Congressman in to the middle of the fray. The Congressman was an unfortunate part of this until his staff bought in as well. Barry Pruett, the husband of a McClintock staffer is the President of a fake unit in Nevada County that Tom helped cover up. In addition, Pruett filed one of the complaints used as the basis to expel us for life.

Sorry Tom McClintock – you really should thank Tom Hudson and your staff for all of this. You have been issued your own piece of political hell courtesy of them.

It looks like the brain-drain from the CRA Board of Directors after the 5/30 lynching may well lead them to bow to Hudson’s deception. If they cede their oversight to Thomas N Hudson and Craig Alexander (and three rabid dogs) with regard to legal action – they may as well get the deeds to their houses out along with any investment statements, valuable articles and the like.

The CRA has no insurance, thanks again to Tom Hudson convincing enough “fiscally conservative” anti-insurance  board members that buying insurance would lead to a lawsuit. I have news for all of them – If Tom and Craig come after George and I, it’s on. Buying Insurance is smart, suing people when you don’t have any is not smart. (even if you can act as your own lawyer)

Tom McClintock and his staff emboldened Tom Hudson. Alice Khosravy, Tim Thiesen, Carl Brickey, Wendy Albright, David Gauny, Mark Gardner and others on the CRA’s board emboldened Tom Hudson. Now it is payday. There aren’t enough of you in the CRA to deal with what is coming. You could have stopped at any time, but you did not.

The CRA and its’ board members are on a collision course with being right at the expense of their non-existent integrity and financial ruin. For what? Because it wasn’t enough to toss us from CRA, they needed to destroy us.

The CRA is not just right, they are really right. This is why they could not stop. They can’t. They have gone way too far and the only way out without having to admit fault is through us.

Tom Hudson sent an email to the CRA’s board after a couple of board members rightly pointed out the following risks to CRA:

1. CRA losing its’ charter

2. CRA members losing their CRP delegate status

3. Putting the $37k currently in the CRA’s operating account at risk (ironically, 24k of it I raised)

4. Putting the board members of the CRA at risk.

5. Irrepairable political damage from Tom Hudson’s rampage. (Threatening Acres of Hope, Courage Worldwide and Lighthouse Family Counseling in the name of CRA)

The text of Hudson’s Email follows:

Dear John and fellow CRA Board members,
John Briscoe and Benita Gagne are both opposing a Special Litigation Committee that is identical to similar committees that they have both previously supported TWICE.
What is different this time?  That blog.  Apparently, despite (sic) reputation for lying and then apologizing for it, some people still believe whatever he tells them.  (I am not calling anyone a puppet of the Parks; I am just reporting the facts.)
Rest assured that I am in no hurry to engage in litigation and neither is anyone else on the current Board or on the proposed committee.  As most of you know, I personally drafted the sections of the CRA Bylaws that prohibit litigation and I was closely involved in the process of creating the California Republican Party’s alternative dispute resolution process.
Voting to approve the proposed Special Litigation Committee will not amend the CRA Bylaws or the CRP Bylaws and it will not encourage litigation.  Voting to oppose the committee will not prevent litigation, as a matter of law.  If you don’t believe me, please consider the fact that we have had a committee of this nature for many years and no one has been sued by us.  We were sued at a time that no such committee existed.  This committee is simply a way for us to get things done and be prepared to defend CRA’s interests in a manner that is consistent with corporate law and the attorney-client privilege.  That’s why John Briscoe and Benita Gagne supported this kind of committee in the past.  Nothing has changed.
I would urge you to vote YES on this committee and let’s move on.
Lie #1 – The CRA has never delegated its’ ability to sue and threaten people legally to a committee (at least in the 17+ years I was a part of it). Hudson needs this in order to cover himself after the fact for acting outside the CRA’s by-laws.
Lie #2 – the deceptive language of being in no hurry to engage in litigation. Tom is on tilt. Based on what we know of him, he will throw the CRA in front of himself just to try to take a chunk out of us. Look at what he has done to Ed Rowen and others in his current rampage.
Why else does Tom Hudson need this committee now? The CRA’s Board is supposed to meet in September.
Tom Hudson had to invoke my name as it appears he is losing the board vote. Has the predicted revolt to harpoon Tom and Craig already started?
We were ready from jump street for this outcome. We can see self-righteous idiots from miles away. I have dealt with Nerds, Sociopaths, Narcissists, Ego Maniacs and combinations of the previous for the entire 18 years I have been in politics.
One of the key hallmarks of mental illness is when an apology gets used against me. Karen England did that and she ended up getting run out of California and is now in Nevada after getting her reputation exposed…
Batter up.
P.S. Additional emails I have received since writing this post indicate that Tom Hudson and Craig Alexander fully well intend to sue us despite the consequences. When it happens, we told you so.

CRA Rampage Update: Craig Alexander Lied Too? Is This Their Legal Strategy?

 California Republican Assembly, Craig Alexander, Thomas N Hudson, Tom Hudson  Comments Off on CRA Rampage Update: Craig Alexander Lied Too? Is This Their Legal Strategy?
Aug 022015

Not one lying lawyer, but two? Sometimes I miss stuff until further evaluation.

Remember on 5/30 when the Placer RA disbanded? Then, Tom Hudson who was feeling a huge loss of control (and humiliation) went berserk. He got the board to refuse the surrender of the charter while claiming somehow that Tracy and Kirk were no longer on the PCRA board. (Which would be impossible if the 5/30 surrender was rejected)

Tom needed the circumstances just so. Then, to be right – he had to create the embezzlement mantra – because he wanted the money back that was disbursed out of the club’s operating account.

Then – in the name of the CRA, he started threatening people. Then he got Craig Alexander to start sending letters. Then they sent more letters.

In the process of all this, Ed Rowen, who was trying to play both sides got exposed and caught. Rowen actually voted to spend the money as well.

Are you confused? Imagine trying to explain this to a judge. The problem for Tom Hudson is that he is a bully and a sociopath. Since he has no conscience, he has started and continued to lie. He can’t keep it all straight. He has accused his co-conspirator Ed Rowen of embezzlement by inference as well, as Tom uses and discards people. (similar to his co-conspirator Alice Khosravy)

Remember the demand letter they sent to Courage Worldwide?

Tom is now trying to claim the threat was done on behalf of the Placer CRA! He is lying. He has to cover himself because he went on a psycho rampage to get his own way and he burnt himself. Bullies do stupid things like this. Mr. Hudson has given Alice Khosravy, Tim Thiesen and Carl Brickey the cause and the cover they need to run him out of office. (which they were planning anyway)

I have thought that all of the things Tim, Alice and Carl were saying to me about Thomas N Hudson. The were derisive, but true. The nature of the comments goes beyond their usual pattern of deception while plotting to stab someone in the back. Their animus toward Tom goes back before the Jan 2015 board meeting where they decided to get rid of George and I.

I have come to believe that Tom participated with them, and Ed Rowen spilled the beans. This is why they were unable to defeat George for re-election. They were supposed to screw the Placer CRA out of its’ delegates.

The same Thomas N Hudson who was willing to screw over his home unit, is now accusing its’ puppet President of Embezzlement. I guess Ed Rowen likes abusive relationships.

Tom Hudson also got Craig Alexander to threaten local charities in the name of CRA and the Placer CRA and is once again throwing Ed Rowen under the bus… blaming him (he is the President of the Placer CRA) for the legal threats.

Craig Alexander missed that memo. He should have talked this through before sending the legal threats. Apparently, Craig wants to get us so bad he just ruined his own reputation for integrity. I have known Craig to be self righteous, yet stupid politically. When we helped defeat Celeste Greig in 2013, Craig swore out a blood oath against us. Even after we discovered that Alice Khosravy’s fraud may have led to Celeste losing – Craig would hear nothing of it – joining in the cover up of Alice’s fraud. This is five-star stupid as Alice and Wendy Albright hate Craig with a passion and they will harpoon him at the next convention.

Now Craig is a liar, too. He has passed the basic character test to be on the CRA’s board. (several on the board are honest, but they will be systematically eliminated)

The legal demand letter is dated 7/10/2015. The Placer CRA Board met on 5/30 to disband. The Placer CRA re-organizational meeting (in violation of state CRA by-laws) was held on 7/13/2015. How did the Placer CRA retain him? Even at the 7/13/2015 PCRA meeting, there was no discussion of authorizing a jihad against the recipients of the money.

The first sentence of the legal demand letter says Craig was retained by the CRA and the PCRA. This is impossible, as in this is a lie intended to deceive the charity in to returning the money. This lie worked on Acres of Hope.

Craig Alexander lied and a women’s shelter was ripped off of their $1400 check. I hope it was worth it to be right.

I have spoken to CRA board members. The CRA board did not authorize legal demand letters to be sent in the CRA’s name to the local charities. Craig Alexander violated the CRA’s By-Laws, another lie.

Craig Alexander is now no better than the scum he crusades against. He has been hudsonized. Even though Tim Thiesen, Alice Khosravy and the Bathroom Boys are maladjusted creeps – they have not put the CRA at legal risk. They are garden variety nerds that lie, cheat and steal within the organization to control endorsements and internal officer elections.

Craig and Tom are next level stupid. They apparently want to bankrupt the CRA, and expose their board to personal liability because their egos are bruised. If the Judge does not toss their case for lack of chromosomes, he will feel like he is in the middle of a revenge of the nerds episode.

One thing is for certain – anyone with a brain had better steer clear of CRA, because they are not just right, they are really right.